Crawled vs Discovered — currently not indexed
Two different problems with nearly identical names. One is a crawl-capacity issue, the other is a quality judgement — and they need opposite responses.
These two statuses in the Page indexing report look like variants of the same thing. They are not, and treating them the same way wastes a lot of effort. The difference is one word: whether Google has actually fetched the page.
Discovered — currently not indexed
Google knows the URL exists and has not fetched it yet. Found in a sitemap or a link, queued, not crawled.
This is a capacity problem, not a judgement. The usual causes:
- Your server is slow or unstable. Google reduces crawl rate when it detects strain. This is the most common cause on shared hosting, and the fix is hosting, not content.
- Too many URLs for the site's crawl allocation. Frequently faceted navigation, calendar pages, or paginated archives generating combinations nobody needs.
- The site is new. New domains get very little crawl budget. Sometimes the answer is a month of patience.
What helps: fix server response times, cut the number of low-value crawlable URLs, and link the pages you care about from somewhere Google crawls often. What does not help: resubmitting the sitemap repeatedly.
Crawled — currently not indexed
Google fetched the page, looked at it, and decided against indexing it. That is a quality or duplication judgement, and it is the harder of the two.
Common reasons, roughly in order:
- Thin or templated content. Programmatically generated pages where only a name or a city changes are the classic case.
- Near-duplicate of another page of yours. Google has picked one and is holding the rest.
- Nothing new on the web. A page covering a topic already covered better elsewhere, adding no information.
- Effectively orphaned. In the sitemap, linked from nowhere. A page nothing links to reads as a page you do not value.
- Sitewide quality drag. If a large share of your URLs are thin, indexing gets harder for all of them. This is the uncomfortable one, and the answer is usually deletion.
What helps: make the page substantially better or merge it into a page that is; link to it properly from relevant pages; and remove or noindex the pages you cannot justify. Cutting a thousand thin URLs frequently improves indexing of the rest.
Neither status is an error and neither needs "fixing" as a count. Plenty of URLs belong in these buckets — tag archives, filtered views, pagination. Check whether the URLs listed are pages you actually want indexed before treating the number as a problem.
Working through it
- Open the affected URLs and sort out what they actually are. If they are mostly junk, the real fix is stopping their generation.
- Run URL Inspection on a page you genuinely want indexed. It will tell you the canonical Google picked, which often explains the whole thing.
- Request indexing for a handful of genuinely important pages. It works at that scale and is useless at any larger one.
- Give it weeks. Both statuses can resolve on their own, and re-requesting daily changes nothing.
One thing to rule out first: if the pages once had traffic and stopped, this may be a symptom rather than the cause — work through why did my clicks drop instead.
Searchlight covers performance data. The Page indexing report is web-only, but the click loss it causes shows up here first.
See how Searchlight shows it